GORT

Reviews

Taxonomy Of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective

Di: Everly

(PDF) Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective

To bridge this void, we employ Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to systematically derive a taxonomy of digital platforms. Specifically, we embrace

AI Service Platform Taxonomy Twenty-Ninth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2021), [Marrakesh, Morocco|A Virtual AIS Conference]. 1 GATEWAYS TO ARTIFICIAL

Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Business Model Perspective

Table 1. Key Concepts in the Digital Platform Context – „Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective“

Considering digital platforms from an organizational perspective, we extend on seminal insights and develop the concept of platform organization. We argue that platform

  • A Taxonomy of Industrial IoT Platforms’ Architectural Features
  • A taxonomy and ontology for digital platforms
  • Developing a Taxonomy for Digital Platforms
  • Opening the Black Box of Digital B2B Co-creation Platforms: A Taxonomy

Our findings suggest that digital platforms exhibit characteristics on at least four dimensions—namely, infrastructure, core, ecosystem, and servicedimen- sions.

To bridge this void, we em- ploy Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to systematically de- rive a taxonomy of digital platforms. Specifically, we embrace a platform

Development of Dimensions for the Digital Health Platform Taxonomy (presentation following Remane et al. (2016) adjusted for our research) Taxonomy for Digital Health

Developing a Taxonomy for Digital Platforms

Solving the chicken-or-egg problem and leveraging value contributing actors on the platform is crucial to establish dynamic platform-based ecosystems. A digital platform

2.1 Digital Platforms. Originally viewed as multi-sided markets that enable interactions between different actors, the digital platform concept increasingly captured

We address the observed lack of shared conceptualizations by creating a taxonomy for digital platforms, by classifying digital platforms according to their distinctive

We address the observed lack of shared conceptualizations by creating a taxonomy for digital platforms, by classifying digital platforms according to their distinctive

We find 17 dimensions that describe B2B co-creation platforms in terms of their platform architecture, their actor ecosystem, and their value creation process.

To unveil different IIoT platform configurations and better understand their architectural design, we systematically develop and validate a taxonomy of IIoT platforms‘ architectural features based

In this paper, we apply Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to derive a taxonomy of B2B co-creation platforms drawing on 36 research articles and 63 real

platform*” OR “digital platform*”) AND ABSTRACT(“architecture” OR “taxonomy” OR “classification”). This search string resulted in 281 publications which we subse-quently

Building on the proposed taxonomy, we derive four DP archetypes that follow distinct design configurations, namely business innovation platforms, consumer innovation

To bridge this void, we employ Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to systematically derive a taxonomy of digital platforms. Specifically, we embrace a platform

Taxonomy of Digital Platforms – „Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective“ Figure 1. Taxonomy of Digital Platforms – „Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A

This digital platform taxonomy facilitates and improves the classification of digital platforms and enables researchers to study the relationships among these different types of

We follow Nickerson et al.’s (2013) method for taxonomy development. By validating the conceptually derived design dimensions with ten DP cases, we identify platform structure and platform

What is a Digital Platform (Infographic) - A Complete Guide

We follow Nickerson et al.’s (2013) method for taxonomy development. By validating the conceptually derived design dimensions with ten DP cases, we identify platform structure and

Digital platforms bring together three important stake-holders: the platform owner, complementors, and users. The platform owner runs and governs the digital platform. Complementors build on

1. Introduction. Digital twins (DTs) can play an important role in successful development of cyber-physical production systems (CPPS) since they connect the physical

To bridge this void, we employ Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to systematically derive a taxonomy of digital platforms. Specifically, we embrace

To enable comparability of research results and uniform theory building, this study analyzes existing literature and conceptually develops a comprehensive taxonomy for digital

To bridge this void, we employ Nickerson et al.’s method for taxonomy development to systematically derive a taxonomy of digital platforms. Specifically, we embrace a platform

While prior research has already made attempts to aggregate and structure knowledge on B2B platforms, they are either limited to a specific perspective (e.g., technical platform architecture ,

In line with the multi-layered architecture of digital industrial platforms depicted in Fig. 1, with the platform itself as a service layer performing a connecting role between devices

We follow Nickerson et al.’s (2013) method for taxonomy development. By validating the conceptually derived design dimensions with ten DP cases, we identify platform

14th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, February 24-27, 2019, Siegen, Germany Taxonomy of Digital Platforms: A Platform Architecture Perspective Michael Blaschke1, Kazem