GORT

Reviews

Nikon 14-24M F/2,8 Vs 16-35Mm F/4 Vr

Di: Everly

Nikon Nikkor z 14-24mm F/2,8*. Ehrlicherweise muss ich natürlich sagen das 14-30 mm F/4,0 macht, was es soll und das auch noch sehr gut (allein das Gewicht, die Größe

Having said that, Sigma’s 35mm f/1.4 Art is one of the best lenses out there to photograph the Milky Way due to it’s enormous clear aperture and ability to render stars as

Which Nikon wide angle: 14-24 or 16-35 VR? | Richard Peters Wildlife ...

Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 vs. 16-35mm f/4

Nikon has since released other mirrorless ultra-wides, including the Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S, the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S, and By comparison, this lens’s predecessor – the

That same Tammy can produce reasonable sharp images, even wide open at f/2.8@17mm and f/4@35mm. 28-300 Left, 16-35 Right. Both f/4 at 35mm. 28-300 Left, 16-35

This is a big lens, bigger than the 17-35mm f/2.8 and almost as big as the 14-24mm f/2.8. Thus, it will tend to be front-heavy on the smaller bodies. Balances fine on a D5, though ;~). Thus, it will

In this article, we’ll dive deep into a comprehensive comparison of these two remarkable lenses, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses across various aspects, from image quality to build and ergonomics.

  • Nikon 14-24 versus Nikon 16-35
  • Nikon 16-35mm f4 VR vs 14-24mm f2.8 S-Line
  • Nikon 14-24m f/2,8 vs 16-35mm f/4 VR
  • Nikon 16-35mm f/4G Lens Review

Both the Nikon 16-35mm f4G ED VR and the Nikon 14-24mm f2.8G ED has the same Nikon F (FX) lens mount. Some of the latest released cameras that are compatible with the Nikon F

I had the 14-24mm F/2.8G (F-mount) and now have the 14-30mm F/4S (Z-mount). There are several reasons I chose the latter and like it: If you’re happy with your 16

What is the difference between Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR and Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens ranking.

Nikon 16-35 f/4 Or Sigma 14-24 f/2.8

This is Nikon’s fast ultra-ultrawide zoom for their full-frame mirrorless Z cameras. The 14-24mm range is quite limited; for most people it’s not as useful as the Z 14-30mm f/4 or

Nikon Objectif Nikkor AF-S 16-35 mm f/4G ED VR . 1 299 subtilités et de le comparer objectivement avec les dernières alternatives du marché comme le Nikon Z 17

I am looking to replace both my Sigma 12-24 (horrible distortion) and Nikkor 18-35 with either a 16-35 or a 14-24, mostly for landscape work with a D700. Does anybody have

  • Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S Review
  • Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR lens
  • Tokina 16-28mm f/2.8 Review
  • Das Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR im Test
  • Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S Review

What is the difference between Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR and Sigma 14-24mm f/2.8 DG HSM Art? Find out which is better and their overall performance in the camera lens

I tested the 16-35mm against my Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 and kept the 14-24mm and later added the 18-35mm f/3.5G (sharper than the 16-35mm). I hoped to get equivalent IQ with

Review: Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR lens – a hands on field test. 22 August 2016. Having previously owned the legendary Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 wide-angle lens, I was keen to try

NIKKOR Z 14–24 mm 1:2,8 S

Build Quality and Weather Sealing: Nikon’s Ruggedness vs Sigma’s Lightweight Design. The Nikon 14-24mm lens boasts a robust and durable build quality, featuring a metal

Hallo Leute, In 2 Monaten geht meine 5-wöchige Amerika-Reise los und ich bin noch etwas daran mein Fotoequipment zu optimieren. Ich habe mir kürzlich das

I’m struggling to think of anything that Nikon could have done to improve this lens. Perhaps they could have chosen to make it a 14-35mm f/2.8 or 12-24mm f/2.8 lens at the

Nikon Z 14-24mm f2.8 S review | Cameralabs

I don’t see what’s wrong with marketing this lens as a 16-30/2,8 VC, and making it a Canon 16-35/4 or Nikkor 16-35/4 competitor. For those who absolutely need the FOV, I

Nikon 14-24 versus Nikon 16-35

Was ist der Unterschied zwischen Nikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm f/4G ED VR und Nikon AF-S Nikkor 14-24mm f/2.8G ED? Finde heraus welches besser ist und dessen gesamt Leistung in

In dem Zuge ver­glei­che ich das 14–24 f/2.8 mal mit allem, was mir der­zeit an Weit­win­keln zur Ver­fü­gung steht: dem 10.5 f/2.8 DX Fishe­ye, dem 10–24 f/3.5–4.5 DX und dem letz­tes Mal

Das Objek­tiv habe ich übri­gens an mei­ner Nikon D700 getestet. Das Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR hat in etwa die Län­ge vom 24-70mm f/2,8, aller­dings eine deut­lich klei­ne­re

Detailed comparison between the nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 and the nikon 16-35mm f/4. Images taken with each lens are compared and contrasted. See more comparisons

The AF-S 16-35m f/4 VR is much more practical today, The Nikon 14mm f/2.8 also works perfectly on every 35mm Nikon made since 1977. It has all the coupling lugs and

If you have a 24-70mm f/2.8 already, and are ok with the focal length overlap, my vote would be for the 16-35mm. As a side note, be aware that the 16-35mm has some massive barrel

This 14-30mm is the lens to take for everything, while the 14-24mm f/2.8 is more for if you’re a dedicated ultra wide fanatic who relishes all the size and weight and limited zoom range just to

In meinem Rucksack steckt schon das 24-70 und das 70-200 2,8. Jetzt stellt sich mir die Frage 14-24 und die 2,8 durchgängig haben oder nicht. Der VR beim 16-35 ich mein