GORT

Reviews

Energy Efficiency Gap

Di: Everly

First, we divide potential explanations for the energy-efficiency gap into three categories: market failures, behavioral explanations, and model and measurement errors. Second, we organize

Extending the Energy efficiency gap

Navigating EPC B: the energy efficiency gap in commercial offices | M ...

Technology and innovation offer a promising avenue to improve energy efficiency in maritime logistics chains (e.g. Miola et al., 2011, Acciaro et al., 2014).Similarly to other

As renewed attention has been given by policy makers to energy conservation issues, it has ft-equently been asserted that an energy-efficiency gap exists between actual and optimal

Cumulative Prospect Theory provides an explanation for the energy efficiency gap. The extent of the gap rises with risk and initial investment costs. In Cumulative Prospect

  • Energy Efficiency trends and policies in Germany
  • Mara Chlechowitz Matthias Reuter Wolfgang Eichhammer
  • Promoting energy efficiency at household level: a literature review
  • Extending the Energy efficiency gap

energy efficiency investments are compelling, there is a gap between the observable and some notion of optimized energy consumption – the so-called energy efficiency gap. Behavioral

Energy efficiency in maritime logistics chains

Many analysts of the energy industry have long believed that energy efficiency offers an enormous „win-win“ opportunity: through aggressive energy conservation policies, we can both

The household sector is one of the most energy-intensive sectors in Europe, and thus a focal point for reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with energy consumption.

Energy efficiency evaluation, technology gap ratio, and determinants of energy productivity change in developed and developing G20 economies: DEA super-SBM and MLI

Understanding drivers of home energy efficiency efforts is important for slowing climate change and managing energy costs. A study now combines open-ended survey

Mind the Gap is an unprecedented attempt to quantify the size of one of the most pervasive barriers to energy efficiency – principal-agent problems, or in common parlance, variations on

We survey the relevant literature on this “energy-eficiency gap” by presenting two complementary frameworks. First, we divide potential explanations for the energy-eficiency gap into three

Thinking About the Energy-Efficiency Gap

Narrowing the regional energy efficiency gap is a process of relative improvement of energy efficiency in areas with lower energy efficiency, which can optimize energy conservation

  • Extending the energy efficiency gap
  • Explaining the energy efficiency gap
  • Development of dual-emitting Sb3+/Eu3+ codoped CaTiO3
  • Is There an Energy Efficiency Gap?

Energy efficiency is one of the key factors in mitigating the impact of climate change and preserving non-renewable resources. Although environmental and economic justifications

Following a detailed review of relevant EE initiatives, the present paper advocates a mix of contemporary information signals that contribute first to decision utility with traditional

Of course, some performance gaps can be overcome over time, and, in some cases, clean technologies already outperform fossil-fuel-based ones. For example, passenger

We begin by decomposing cost-minimizing energy-efficiency decisions into their fundamental elements, which allows us to identify four major questions, the answers to which

Mara Chlechowitz Matthias Reuter Wolfgang Eichhammer

Research has identified an extensive potential for energy efficiency within the manufacturing sector, which is responsible for a substantial share of global energy consumption and

By including energy management into an estimated energy efficiency potential this paper introduces an extended energy efficiency gap, mainly in manufacturing industries and

The gaps between energy efficiency indicators can quantify five energy savings bottlenecks: production management, working mode plan, operation, system design, and

We present two complementary frameworks for understanding this so-called “energy paradox” or “energy-eficiency gap.” First, we build on the previous literature by dividing potential

It calls for countries to set sector-specific global mitigation efforts, including the tripling of renewable energy capacity by 2030, doubling the global average annual rate of energy

Energy efficiency policy to reach the economists’ narrow optimum benefits from a “win–win” argument: saving money for households who otherwise fail to minimize total costs by

to as „investment inefficiencies,“ would create what is popularly called an Energy Efficiency Gap: a wedge between the cost-minimizing level of energy efficiency and the level actually realized.

First, are product offerings and pricing economically efficient? Second, are energy operating costs inefficiently priced and/or understood? Third, are product choices cost-minimizing in present

The literature on the domestic energy efficiency gap is vast, yet, empirical research has largely focused on determining the magnitude of the energy efficiency gap (e.g., Hausman,

4 Die möglichen Gründe für das sogenannte „Energy­Efficiency Gap“ werden in der Literatur bereits sehr lange diskutiert, bspw. von Allcott, H., & Green­ stone, M. (2012). Is there an

By including energy management into an estimated energy efficiency potential this paper introduces an extended energy efficiency gap, mainly in manufacturing industries and the

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions would have been 12 percent higher in 2017, if EE had not im-proved since 2000. In addition, EE

an „energy efficiency gap,“ whereby consumers and firms fail to make seemingly positive net present value energy saving investments. High implicit discount rates, undervaluation of future